POINT
به زبان فارسی
PICTORY
LATEST MUSIC
SEARCH
Neo-Con asset
10-Feb-2008
Once again the neo-cons have given Reza Pahlavi a platform, but it is not clear who the intended audience is. The feigned altruistic appeal in his speech bears an eerie resemblance to the rehearsed Iraqi appeals before that country was invaded. Those appeals cost over one million Iraqi lives. This is a well-written speech, disguised as it may be, to convince. Whether the speech was delivered to persuade the American public of the necessity of intervention and war or the purpose of it was the alienation of Iran’s Arab neighbors, much like his father had in favor of Israel, one can be certain that Norman Podhoretz has given it his blessings, if indeed he has not been the writer himself.
It must be recalled that the events of 9/11 and the tragedy that struck America transformed George W. Bush. On November 19, 1999, Bush the candidate delivered a speech at the Ronald Reagan library at Simi California saying: ….. “And let us have an American foreign policy that reflects American character; the Modesty of true strength, the humility of real greatness.” However, 9/11 prompted him to turn over the foreign policy of the country to the neo-cons who had been waiting in the wings for decades, and who had planned the assault on the Middle East for over a decade. They were ready with a response and in effect, they hijacked the American foreign policy.
On September 20, 2001, Mr. Bush’s assertions were that the United States would pursue global terrorist groups and any nation that harbors or supports terrorism. His National Security Agenda (2002 NSS) was quintessentially neoconservative calling for preemption. Underlying the Bush foreign policy is the assumption that the use of military force to overthrow non cooperative governments in troubled areas is the remedy for terrorism; a page from neo-con D. Perle’s book “An End to Evil”.
Pahlavi invites an attack on Iran by stating that “Iran's clerical regime's continued support for terrorism”.
For neo-cons it is easy to push their agenda and convince the general public that the policies being implemented are based on American values as so many of them have careers in the media or academia (they developed a close tie with Georgetown Center for Strategic Studies among others). One such promoter of American ‘values’ is Benador Associates. Benador Associates arranges their TV appearances and speaking engagements, and helps to place their articles in newspapers. Ms. Benador, the founder of Benador Associates, along with Senator Liberman is busy promoting Reza Pahlavi (Lieberman endorsed McCain who likes to sing Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran). It is worthwhile mentioning another very prominent Benador client and Reza Pahlavi’s colleague and promoter.
Michael Ledeen, the contributing editor of National Review Online has endorsed the "Total war strategy" - His idea is advanced through Benador Associates. “Total War Strategy” was first put forward by Adam G. Mersereau. Ledeen writes: “The method used to destroy Iran, as known in the neo-con circle, will be 'Total War'. A total war strategy does not have to include the intentional targeting of civilians, but the sparing of civilian lives cannot be its first priority ... The purpose of total war is to permanently force your will onto another people group.” See Guardian
Pahlavi calls the regime in Iran terrorists, aware that such definitions will draw the US military into a bloody battle for the preemption doctrine. He is not mindful of the fact that bringing death and destruction to innocent civilians is the ultimate in terror.
More importantly, language is the best tool for political and social dominance. Those who ‘own’ the language can use value-laden terminology to their great advantage and ‘define’ the other. Terrorism is the definition given by the neo-cons to those they wish to master. It is only relevant if one heeds it. The intellect is often sharper than the biting words. However, it would seem that Reza Pahlavi has felt the need to adapt to his inferior position and adapted to the prevailing definition of social order by trading status for security.
Reza Pahlavi must also know that Iran’s history is filled with a pattern of external powers collaborating and destroying the country’s advancement in its nascent stages at every turn, whether technological empowerment as in the case of the railway, or socio-political, such as democracy and the nationalization of oil, or the current self sufficiency in seeking nuclear technology.
He should recall that after the concessions granted by the Persian government to the (Russian) Discount and Loan Bank of Persia for the construction of the railway line Julfa-Tabriz (1913), the ‘allied’ forces in line with Winston Churchill’s advice, forced the man who had built it, his grandfather, Reza Shah Pahlavi, to abdicate and leave the country. Iran’s democracy and its oil nationalization movement of 1951 to 1953 under Mossadegh were brought to an end by the British with the help of the CIA-backed coup. His father owed his throne to the CIA, it is worthwhile mentioning. Today, it seems that Reza Pahlavi is asking the same favor from similar groups.
And his lack of understanding of nuclear power…
Pahlavi should know that at the Iraq war created a pro-natalist atmosphere. Families were even given incentives to have more children. In addition, the war caused immense damage to the infrastructure prompting the new government to rethink its position about starting up the nuclear power plants. Furthermore, according to Saad Rahim, an analyst at Washington consultancy PFC Energy claims that Iran needs to diversify its energy needs in addition to a change in its policies, otherwise, "Iran's net crude exports could fall to zero." But since Pahlavi’s concerns are to please the neocon bosses, and to convince the American people that Iran is a threat, the truth is being concealed.
On every continent nuclear and radiation techniques are put in the service of humankind. Recently, it was witnessed that due to a problem with a Canadian nuclear reactor that produces medical isotopes used to diagnose and treat cancer and cardiovascular disease, patients in Canada, U.S. and other countries had their tests and treatment postponed. Since Pahlavi is in the U.S., he is no doubt indifferent to the plight of the Iranians and their welfare.
Iranian nationalists have asked the world at large, America in particular to leave them alone. Pahlavi has no love for Iranians, much less an understanding of them. Even the Cuban-Americans who have held the foreign policy of this country towards Cuba hostage for decades, do not have the audacity to select a leader and have someone represent Cuba from exile. A self-appointed traitor who has surrendered his reins to the neo-cons does not speak for Iranians.
| Recently by Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich | Comments | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Patriots who want their country destroyed | 123 | Sep 12, 2008 |
| The Dutch Connection | 55 | Sep 01, 2008 |
RECENT COMMENTS
IRANIANS OF THE DAY
| Person | About | Day |
|---|---|---|
| نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
| Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
| Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
| احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
| Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
| گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
| Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
| محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
| Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Does he write his speech?
by amirkabear4u on Mon Feb 18, 2008 02:23 AM PSTI am wondering if this reza writes his own speech or his american secretary does? It seems his comments are repeats almost like an essay. With the attitude IRI showing in world's political stage reza had golden opportunity to change it but why hasn't he? Is it too difficult for him? Maybe politics is not for him. His grandfather and shah are one cause of IRI what makes us to believe he is not the same ??!!!!
Good Heavens! Jall'llal Khalegh!?
by An Observer (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 06:54 PM PSTQ is gay!?!?!?
300 comments and
by Jalili (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 05:14 PM PSTthis is the crap we are left with? Filth and homophobia.
Infidel: put your money where your mouth is
by Q on Sun Feb 17, 2008 02:59 PM PSTI never made a conclusion about the elections. YOu did. If you don't think the elections were fair, produce some evidence and conclusion by any objective international organization that says so. Furthermore, explain to me who would have won if the elections WERE fair.
Now you can distract and start accusing me of this or that but until you do those two things, you really ARE just wasting time.
PS to 300: True, but thanks to these comments, this story will be up in the front page for weeks.
I am the 300th comment
by 300 (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 02:56 PM PSTBut Soraya don't let it go into your head. As you see 99% of these comments have NOTHING to do with you or your drivel. These guys simply need to bash each other's head and thanks to JJ, this oppoertunity is provided to them. You are simply a vehicle, and baby waht a vehicle you are. Thanks for the ride :0))
Q: I'm sorry you don't see
by infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 02:51 PM PSTQ: I'm sorry you don't see your ironic sectarianism in full display here...Obviously, you're too invested in this...and nothing I say will change your mind. You're in denial if you think the "elections" were fair...enjoy your self-deception my friend while it lasts. You're not really interested in anything but to defend the Islamic Republic policies no matter how hypociritical and inhumane...waste of my time.
Infidel, you have it all wrong
by Q on Sun Feb 17, 2008 02:48 PM PSTYou are the one who put the conflict on those terms. Anyone can read below and see that you are talking about Sunni versus Shia and who hurts who and who is backed by who.
You are of course leaving off half the story, as well as making not even a peep about US responsibility.
I accept the will of the Iraqi people They did have 2 or 3 elections which were internationally recognized and all major Iraqi groups are represented, in fact mostly beyond their proportions. The question is, why don't YOU respect the results?
You can speak on behalf of Iraqis if you want, saying 'they want this, and they don't want that' but that is your opinion. The only concrete fact we have about what Iraqis want is the election results, which you don't approve of? Why not respect the will of Iraqis?
There is a definite rise of Shia Islam as the dominate power in Iraq. People who are threatened by this would like to blame the current escapegoat which is Iran. The truth is that the Shia were persecuted for years under Saddam Hussein and even the previous Iraqi minority rulers. If there is a revival and backlash it is because of this reality. Something similar will probably happen in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf states as is happening in Lebanon too. And people like yourself will find it easier to blame Iran than to face reality.
Know Thy Enemy
by Kamran (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 02:02 PM PSTThose who want to understand the American and European "mindset" need to remember lynching.
//www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/11232007/profile...
I'm neither concerned about
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 01:14 PM PSTI'm neither concerned about the Iraqi gov't or the Iranian gov't. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy.
Q: You sound secterian and it is not nice. Why do you categorize people based on their religion? I don't want an Islamic either Shia or Sunni gov't and I think that's what most Iraqis want too. However, only Iraqis can decide that in a free election without the advice of the Not so Grand Ayatollah Sistani. And Iran should stop this sectarianism. It will not lead to anything good for Iran or the shia in the long run.
I have no solution and I would not dare to propose one either because It's up to Ir
aqis alone (not shia or Sunni) to decide what's good for them.
BTW, Iran is already demonized and has been for centuries in the Sunni world.
Infidel, I can help your confusion
by Q on Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:57 PM PSTSo.... you are saying Iran should not support the Iraqi government which US supports? Should Iran instead support the opposition?
US puppet regime of Maliki which the Isalmic Republic supports and loves
It sounds like you have a problem with the US, not Iran. I don't blame you, they are the most responsible for all the death and misery in the region. They are the reason there is such a government in place and if you have a problem with it, you should go to the source of the problem. There are many governments including UK, France, Israel, Russia, all the US allies and all of NATO that support the Iraqi government. Where is your outrage against them?
Are you really concerned about the "Iraqi government" or are you just using it as an excuse to demonize Iran? Why don't you think about this for a second.
Secondly, who do you think should be in charge in Iraq? Sunnis are 15% of the population and they will never hold power again, unless it's a dictatorship. The most popular Iraqi right now is Moqtada Al Sadr or perhaps Ayatollah Sistani. Do you think any Sunni could possibly win any election? What's your solution?
going wild with your imagination (to: infidel)
by Anonymo7 (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:13 PM PSThey infidel, it seems you don't read carefully , as I said "Look at the lies that sold the Iraq war: (US public center for Integrity link).
//www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/Default.asp.. "
one of those lies was the existence of WMDs in Iraq. Anyway I agree with you that necons/AIPAC cooked up war was for a number of reasons one of which was Oil.
The other thing I agree with you is that US is working with Iran (and vise versa) to prevent the situation from getting worse in Iraq, and that is a very good thing.
BTW I am not Neama, and read carefully before you bang on your keyboard!
Yes, the US puppet regime of
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:05 PM PSTYes, the US puppet regime of Maliki which the Isalmic Republic supports and loves...
Infidel: what puppet regime, the one the US set up?
by Q on Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:51 AM PSTjust clarifying which puppet regime you are talking about.
Reprinted from:
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:44 AM PSTReprinted from:
//angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/02/sectarian-po...
"Sectarian politics: worse than disunity is sectarian solidarity. Read the text of this lousy letter from the Lebanese state's most senior Shi`ite cleric, `Abdul-Amir Qabalan, to Iraqi puppet prime minister, Nuri Al-Maliki. Notice that he called on him to seek the guidance of the lousy Ayatullahs in Najaf--who are still worried about Chess but not about foreign occupation--and to combat "corruption and terrorism" but not foreign occupation. In fact, he did not use the word occupation in this lousy letter. So according to Shi`ite sectarian parties in the Middle East, foreign occupation is undesirable except when Shi`ite sectarian puppets are installed by occupation forces. This explains why you will not hear one word of criticisms of the Iraqi puppet government in Hizbullah's propaganda outlets. So if Dahlan were to convert to Shi`ism, would he obtain the support of Qabalan?
//www.annahar.com/content.php?priority=18&tab...
clear that having US troops stay in Iraq is a strategic move for Iran, for Hezbollah, and for Syria. It's like an ace in a game of black mail. I do not believe McCain, who also favors the continued occupation, has any idea on how the game is played. And neither does Cheney nor Condi.
At the end of the day, it's against US interests to keep the troops in Iraq for the improbable hope of influencing the political direction in Iraq. It's a costly move wholly beneficial to Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria, and frought with peril for Israel. Surely, the neo-cons have changed the middle-east in the exact opposite way they wished for. They made history, very bad history about themselves.
It's a mistake to read this as sectarian solidarity.
//angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/02/sectarian-po...
REad the rest of the comments on that thread.
anonymous 7: Nema??? You're
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:56 AM PSTanonymous 7: Nema??? You're too ignorant for words. The war was about oil and the Islamic Republic collaborated/facilitated both invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Iran wants to share the oil fields in South of Iraq with the Americans. And that is why they have had four rounds of talks so far.
Don't be so naive. Iraqis see right through it. Your self-deception is embarassing.
Next Iran-US talks on Iraq to be Held at Expert Level
February 13, 2008
Islamic Republic News Agency
IRNA News
The fourth round of Iran-US talks on Iraq would be held at expert level, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said on Wednesday.
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a cabinet session, the minister said, "The date of the talks would be announced soon." Iran and US officials have so far held three rounds of talks on security situation in Iraq. The talks were held on May 28, July 24 and August 6 with the participation of Iran's Ambassador to Iraq Hassan Kazemi Qomi, his US counterpart Ryan Crocker and representatives of the Iraqi government.
Mottaki also said that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would definitely visit Iraq adding that preparations have been made for the visit.
The minister added that President Ahmadinejad's visit would take place at the invitation of Iraqi officials.
Noting that the visit would have positive effects on Tehran-Baghdad relations, Mottaki said that the visit will help promote Iran-Iraq economic and cultural cooperation.
//www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-22/080213310...
Lies that sold Iraq war (to : infidel)
by Anonymous7 (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:24 AM PSTHey infidel, it was not Iran that attacked Iraq in 2003 and it is not Iran that is to be blamed for the consequences of that fiasco. You may like to forget it but somebody was looking for WMDs that he knew did not exist! Look at the lies that sold the Iraq war: (US public center for Integrity link).
//www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/Default.asp...
Anonymous 2: Do you deny
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 08:19 AM PSTAnonymous 2: Do you deny that the Islamic Republic endorses the puppet gov't of Maliki? Ahmadinejad is set to go to Iraq and meet with the puppet gov't as we speak.
Apparently, the new style of 'debunking' is of the form: "Don't believe X as he is associated with Y". Unlike you, I'm not an ideologue and don't see the world as black and white.
You also can't just disregard any source of information just because they don't parrot your talking points. You can bring evidence to disagree with them. Intoning "Monarchist, MKO" as a magic incantation doesn't obviate that. I have no political agenda either on the left or the right. I find it unethical to politicize human sufferings and turning a blind eye to injustice. I couldn't care less about the monarchists or MKO. They are all corrupt and not genuine in their intentions. They are driven by lust for power which makes them abhorant in my eyes. I also think that the left is just as abhorant in aligning itself with the Islamic Republic and has its own agenda in the domestic politics of the United States. But that's another topic in and of itself.
You reap what you sow:
What Islamic Republic has been doing to Sunnis in Iraq; Palestinian Iraqis; Lebanon, and Bahrain, etc.is hypocritical and unforgivable. More than 3 million sunni Iraqi refugees blame the Islamic Republic...please try to visit Arab blog and read Arab news. ultimately, All of this adventurism, fomenting sectarian rivalarlies, is going to hurt Iran and Iranians not the mullahs and their families
//www.sahafa.com/NewspapersandMagazines.aspx
//www.raghidadergham.com/4rdarticles.html (she is Lebanese)
//angryarab.blogspot.com
annonymous2: Do you support
by Infidel (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 08:00 AM PSTannonymous2: Do you support the Islamic Republic of IRan? Do you support the puppet government of Maliki in Iraq? Are you denying that Iran and the US collborated and are collaborating to loot Iraq and Iraqi's oil????
Another person who hasn't done his homework; Mr. Darfur
by Anonymous-2 (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 07:48 AM PSTMr. Darfur Awareness have you also not educated yourself first, like Mr. Educated Yourself, before you posted this website . //iranianlobby.com/index.phppagearticles
There are obviously many commentators on this website who would like to distort the truth and present false propaganda. Well I guess, with eight years of Bush and his neo-con Administration in power it has become the fashion de jour to disseminate false information. What the heck, Bush was able to deceive the American public for eight years, and these guys think they can do the same. However, there is a major difference between the gullible American public and the Iranians who eat, drink and dream of politics day in and day out. This goes to show why neither the MEK nor the Monarchists will be successful in their attempt to vie for power in Iran. They are clueless of the Iranian mentality and clueless of the kiss of death when they associate themselves with the neo-cons, Zionists warmongers and other charlatans.
For almost three decades now the MEK and the Monarchists have been rejected by Iranians in Iran and Iranians abroad - and now they willingly let themselves be used by the neo-cons irrelevant of the death and destruction that would be visited on regular Iranians if their policy prescriptions are pursued.
One of these characters is Mr. Hassan Daioleslam the creator of the website of Pro- IRI lobbyist who by many accounts is an MEK member. These people are willing sock-puppets for war-mongers such as , Kenneth Timmerman, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Pearle, and Ladeen.
Of course the MEK and Monarchists have to advocate that any group which is against sanctions, military attack, and foreign intervention in the affairs of Iran must be called IRI agents, otherwise if U.S. and Iran normalize relations where does that leave the Monarchists and the MEK? They would become irrelevant wouldn’t they?.
Mr. Darfur Awareness who continuously points to this website of Pro-IRI lobby, should know that Mr. Daioleslam has absolutely no credibility whatsoever.
Furthermore, simply placing 5 articles from the web-sites of CASMII and NIAC only demonstrates that both organizations are pro peaceful resolution of any disputes between the U.S. and Iran. The same goes for Mr. Ray Takeye, a Senior Fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, as well as congressman Dennis Kucinich, and many other Congressional representatives and Senators who are against war and U.S. gun boat diplomacy. I don’t think you can call them Pro-IRI Lobbyist can you?? If so, then your ignorance just speaks for itself.
For those who are not already familiar with the association of the MEK and the Monarchists, including Mr.Reza Pahlavi with the neocons and Zionists such as: Kenneth Timmerman, Michael Ladeen, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the other warmongers just do your own homework and you will find that both of these groups are in bed with the enemies of Iran and the Iranian people.
To: Educate yourself, have you educated yourself????
by Anonymous-2 (not verified) on Sun Feb 17, 2008 06:28 AM PSTInteresting how people pick and choose, articles, and bias websites only to serve their own interest.
Mr. Educate yourself have you educated yourself about the true agenda of this website “Al-Moharer” before you presented it to the readers of this website?
Have you tried to understand who are these people who are writing these articles, and what is their political agenda?
Have you done your homework by looking at all the web links to figure out whether the information is coming from an unbiased website recounting true historical facts or not?
If you had done your homework properly you would have figured out that this is not a Sunni website but a Baathist website, and written by supporters of Saddam Hussein. There is a difference between being a Sunni and being members and supporters of the Baathists.
According to articles written by supposed "scholars" Saddam was not brought to power by the CIA, Saddam had no linkage with the CIA, Saddam did not receive arms and equipment and assistance from the U.S. in invading Iran; Saddam had no intention of massacring the Kurds - the Kurds brought that upon themselves -blah, blah, blah.....
Their version of history is from their own point of view with an intention of distorting history - no wonder Iran and all facets of Iranian history: from the start of the Arab invasion and introduction of Islam, and every historical account of Iran and disputes with the Arabs, portray Iranians as the evil country past and present (from the beginning of Arab invasion, during the Shah, and since the Revolution of 1979).
If you wanted to really demonstrate everything that this article stated as historical facts, then why did you not also throw in the web-link which discusses the Palestinians? The history of the Palestinians, and how the Jews and Zionist with the assistance of England robbed the Palestinians of their land. How the Zionists with the assistance of the U.S. are involved in ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians?
Did you also forget to mention how Saddam had been harboring the terrorist organization of the MEK, and using this despicable group to kill Iranians and destabilize Iran?
Did you also take note of Saddam’s message that it is the duty of all Iraqi Muslims to become mujahids: God is Most Great.
Perished be the impossible.
Long live mujahids……”
What kind of credibility does this website have?
What exactly was your agenda in pointing to this website as a source of knowledge? Are you a supporter or a member of the MEK - no pun intended?
I strongly suggest, before you admonish others, that you first do your own homework. Please don’t take readers of these articles as gullible fools who will take everything mentioned on face value without doing their homework!!
For those who want to understand the true intention of this website I would recommend looking at all the subject posted in order that you may draw your own conclusion.
As one example - the following web link provides you with the views of the writers regarding Saddam and the Baath Party.
//www.al-moharer.net/mohhtm/eng_section265.ht...
Baba you guys shashideed on Soraya and
by Anonymous'2 (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 08:28 PM PSTher essay here!?
to infidel the verrAj
by Anonymous7 (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 05:18 PM PSTHey infidel, although you have been following today's news you don't seem to know what has been going on since 2003 when your heroes (necon/AIPAC) attacked Iraq. I happen to think that attacking Iraq was for dominating the region not for enjoying Baghdad's nice winter!
Behnaz: Enjoy your life
by infidel (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 01:45 PM PSTBehnaz: Enjoy your life with your family my dear and I will enjoy mine. I have nothing against that. Thanks you.
Please answer some of these questions if you can:
I also highly recommend you write a letter to your master Khamanie, Supreme Leader of Ignorance, to stop threatning other countries, financing and backing proxy mercenaries to kill Americans, Lebanese, Iraqi Sunnis, if he really wants the world to leave their immoral and criminal regime alone.
Noone really cares about Iran if they didn't interfer their nose in other people's affairs.
Just today your maniac commander said this:
Annihilation of Zionism Imminent
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian commander said that billions of the oppressed and justice-seeking people worldwide will soon be filled with much joy and happiness when they hear the news of the eventual victory of Islam over the devilish front of Zionism
//www.farsnews.com/English/newstext.php?nn=86...
How many times have we heard these threats coming from the criminal Republic?
Why don't you write to your demented commander and ask him to stop threatning other nations?
What's interesting is to me is to figure out why do Iranians think that if the US ever decides to "attack" or "invade" Iran, it would be for the cause of democracy? Can't the IRanian people see that their government poses a threat to America's (All Western and infidel countries) national and economic interests by exporting militant Islam to destablize the entire ME region? Are we to leave one the ME in the hands of mad mullahs who can't even manage their own country properly and are awaiting for direction from a *well* to start Armageddon on the infidels??? I think NOT!
I highly recommend you write to your Supreme Leader and ask him to not jeopardize the lives of millions of Iranians by financing and promoting terrorism and militant Islam as it is required in Iran's Constitution. You have to ask why the IRI has self-appointed itself to take on the "Great Satan"? Isn't that the Islamic Republic's foreign policy to use proxies like Hizballah to "drive Americans out the ME and onward to Returning Jerusalme to the Ummah?
Do you support the Islamic Republic's hegemonic aspirations in the region? Do you advocate IR's policy of challenging the "Great Satan's so- called "domination" in the ME?
to cry baby Pintel,
by Anonym7 (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 01:34 PM PSTPintel says: "It is embarrassing to see the outright anti-semitisim displayed on this website."
you guys (Zionists, and other extremists) insult Iranians anyway you want, calling them 'sand diggers', 'animals', 'islamofascists', 'tazis', 'arab lovers', ...
I am fine with that, I personally prefer you guys express your disgust with us without following the codes of political correctness, but then don't complain and be ready to take some heat!
infidel I think this is why you are here and I am enjoying my
by behnazi (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 01:13 PM PSTfamily and my country in Iran. It is for best. We do not need hatred and insult like yours. You have no respect for us. You are such tarsoo that you think everyone wants to kill you. Fine, live your happy life in ghorbat, but just tell your president to leave us alone and fix his own problems.
Thank you Annonymous on
by Bijanam (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:27 PM PSTThank you for your educational post. I hope all the islamofascist on this thread open their mind and put aside theirt hate of civiliztion and learn from the depth of knowledge of the region that you and zion offer on the subject.
Thanks again
Behnaz: Are you going to
by infidel (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:22 PM PSTBehnaz: Are you going to behead me or hang me on a mobile crane? Get used to it. Germans were all Nazis and Hitler was a democratically elected president...You reap what you sow. All Iranians were Zoroastrians before the Islamic armies ravaged their cities.
mullah in Iran: "This Year is the Year of preventing the Youth to convert to Zoroastrianism
امسال سال جلوگیری از جوانان شیعه برای زرتشتی شدن است!
//news.gooya.com/didaniha/archives/2008/02/06...
Anonymous, have you ever been to Iran?
by behnazi (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:42 AM PSTIn mozakhrafat chieh akheh? Irania mosalmanand vali alaihe diktatori hastand.
Iranian muslim is an
by Anonymous on Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:23 AM PSTIranian muslim is an oxymoron. As a muslim you belong to the ummah. Nationalism is Islam is pagnism.
Iran and all other "Arab" states - including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Tunisia, and Algeria, as well as the entity under the Palestinian Authority - were originally non-Arab nations that were conquered by the Muslim Arabs when they spread out from the Arabian peninsula in the first great wave of jihad in the 7th century, defeating, killing, enslaving, dispossessing, converting, or reducing to the lowly status of dhimmitude millions of Christians and Jews, Zoroastrian exodus to India, and destroying their language (Phoenicians in Lebanon didn't speak Arabic)(Iran is the only country that was able to sustain its own language thanks to our brave poet, Ferdowsi) ancient and flourishing civilizations.
Prior to being Christian, of course, these lands had even more ancient histories. Phraonic Egypt, for example, was not an Arab country through its 3,000-year history.
Islam being wrapped in deception as a spiritual dogma or religion or ideology is more dangerous than Nazism, Communisms, and Fascism of any other kind.
Because unlike non-religious dogmas and other totalitarian systems, the emotional and the so-called spiritual appeal of this fanaticism (infidel vs. ummah, God’s Devine Agents and rulers on earth, blind faith to authoritarian clergy and their dogma) is pervasive and a potent and a dangerous brew that lasts centuries (as we have seen) and we see the end results in every Muslim country. And that is precisely why no other power good or bad has been able to penetrate this pestilence brought about by a bunch of Bedouins.
We need to work on Islamic de-colonization of mind and souls and identify the devastating Pathological affect of this totalitarian ideology.
Notice that the islamists
by Anonymous00 (not verified) on Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:14 AM PSTNotice that the islamists never offer any proof or citations to substantiate their ludicrous assertions, only rhetoric and slogans...how sad.