Capt Ayhab

Free...

Isn't a man entitled to having some fun?

Don't you worry! I am not taking Ahyab seriously, just having some fun cornering him with his own arguments.

Dear Jamshid,

Why waste so much precious time and effort on this odious, know-nothing character?

He says RP should apologize for "his father's crimes," but he never says that Mousavi should apologize for his own crimes (the summer, 1988 liquidation job, for example).

This guy is a massive tool and a hypocrite. Don't waste your time. He's not worth it.

Ahyab

"tafreh raftan" is an easy way out when cornered. That alone is sufficient for me to have made my point.

jamshid

You seem to be just scanning through the answers followed by questions I provided.

Kindly take time and go over them more sincerely this time around. There are no questions left without answers on my part , but other way around many questions are still open.

Regards

-YT 

Ahyab

While I directly answered your questions, you have failed grandly to answer mine. Let's revisit:

I wrote, "Remember that Khomeini who was a moftkhor of khoms and zkaat, and who never worked in his life, and whose "masterpiece" was his book of tozihol masaael, suddenly became qualifed to lead a revolution due to an optimum opportunity rising for him in the right time."

To which you replied: "I personally blame late shah on this one. He gave into the pressure from akhunds..."

I didn't ask you who is to be blamed. I told you that an incompetent nobody like Khomeini could lead a revolution. Therefore, don't judge people abilities solely based on their past job experience. And then you started talking the blame game. You are so childish Ahyab.

Besides, was it also the Shah's fault that Jebeheye Melli supported Khomeini? Was it his fault that the Islamists supported Khomeini? Although Shah is to be blamed, but putting the blame solely on him only displays your deep ignorance of the facts of our history.

You failed to give me an answer on my second question, That in some corners of the world, they call this freedom of speech. That is you are entitled to criticize, but the criticized person is entitled to defend himself AND in turn critisize the opponent and his motifs.

Instead you engaged in safsateh about critisism of a public figure vs a non-public figure.

On the fourth question, you wrote, "do you not think that he should own up and acknowledge the crimes of his dynasty?" I ask you again, do you think Mousavi should own up and acknowledge the massive crimes of the government he directly worked for, which were so much more massive in scales than during the Shah's time, by leaps and bounds, should Mousavi aknowledge those crimes, yes or no?

If no, why not?

If yes, then why are you stucked on RP? Isn't Mousavi more obliged to "aknowledge" crimes of the past? Case in point: You are biased against Pahlavis, period.

The least Mousavi could have done was not to put Khomeini's picture on his desk when formally interviewed. That would be some sort of aknowledgement, but no, nothing.

And you dare to ciritisize Reza Pahlavi on this issue while romancing Mousavi?

On the fifth question, you wrote, "why after all the hell broke lose in Iran and Green movement formed, all of sudden he made a 180 degree turn about?"

When did he turn 180 degree? Could you elaborate on this false accusation? Reza Pahlavi (and many others, including me) still claim that the elections were fake. When this became apparant to the people in Iran as well, they poured into the streets in protest.

That only meant that the people of Iran had at that point joined the opponents of election in believing with certainty that the elections are fake under the IRI. This has only empowered the opponents of election who do and must support the protests against fake elections. This is not 180 degree turn.

In fact, it is people like you who have turned 180 degrees now by finally accepting that the elections are fake under the IRI.

Free, jan chill agho

The only crime Reza Pahlavi is accused of is being a total worthless opportunistic character.

Don't get all bent out of shape, he is not even worthy of being charged with anything other than being a  nothing.

P/S How is yours and COP's blog about me going? you children having fun by yourselves? Tell me about it all later Free Jan, will you please?

-YT 

Snowwhite

Do your own research -- please whatever you do, don't listen to charlatan supporters of the IRI. Sadly, there are scum-ridden souls on this site who spread lies and misinformation with such ease for the direct benefit of the rapists regime in Iran. Why?

Because they are evil.

Forget Reza Pahlavi. I never mentioned him in my post to you -- I just talked about the concept of constitutional monarchy per se, and its benefits. And then, this troll comes around bashing Reza Pahlavi. He even once said that Reza Pahlavi is a "tyrannical Shah wanna-be."

That, my friend, is all you need to know about this deceptive troll. He has a perverse anti-Pahlavi agenda. For example, how does he know that Reza Pahlavi is a"tyrannical Shah wanna-be?" How? Can he read his mind? This troll's petty hatred borne out of massive oghdeh is such that it has taken over his entire cancer-ridden soul.

Oghdeh and hatred is all this troll knows, sadly.

This two-bit troll would rather have rapists like Ahmadinejad and Khamenei stay in power in Iran RAPING AND TORTURING innocent people rather than give Reza Pahlavi a chance, even if just as a president, not king. How creepy is that? I don't know about you, but people like this troll only want to spread disunity amongst the Iranian diaspora, so that their masters can remain in power in Tehran.

Reza Pahlavi is not guilty of ONE SINGLE CRIME -- and yet, this troll would rather have the rapist IRI in power, stealing, raping and murdering Iranians every day! What does that tell you about this perverse troll?

Do your own research. Don't listen to me or this deceptive troll. He is IRI, through and through. Reza Pahlavi is not his father. His greatest crime, according to this troll, is that he hasn't apologized for his father's crimes. Compare Reza Pahlavi's crime of not apologizing for his father's crimes, to REAL CRIMES against humanity and the Iranian nation, which the IRI has perpetrated for over 30 years!

And yet, this troll prefers the IRI. That should tell you something about this despicable troll and his agenda.

Is Reza Pahlavi too good to answer your email?

Is Reza Pahlavi too good to answer your email?

This thread in its entirety has been emailed to Reza Pahlavi, with no avail on his presence nor answer.

I guess questions by a concerned citizen like me/us is not worth his time.

Anytime I correspond with the Senator of my state, the one that I did not vote for, I get an immediate response followed by a phone call
either by the Senator himself or by high ranking staff. This is what I call listening to the citizens, and not what Reza Pahlavi.I am certain every one who has tried contacting their representative/Senator can attest to
this fact. 

-YT

P/S Blog to follow

snowwhite

You have a solid point. Reza Pahlavi is riding on the backs of those young women and men who have been fighting since the election, the same election that he has always been boycotting.  But once the movement started, he has not lost any opportunity with a microphone or camera to shed crocodile tears.

secondly all he has to show for is a blood line of shortest lived dynasty in Iran, meaning the Pahlavi dynasty[50 years]. Not that he is responsible for crimes of his father, but his charade comes to spotlight when he advocates human rights, while being deafeningly silent about all the atrocities during his late father.

By the virtue of his blood line and wishy washy platform, he is always going to be characterized by yet another form of oppression called Rastakhize Meli - Pahlavi Dynasty[single party system] and absolute power that his family excreted on people of Iran.

You are absolutely correct, NO decent and educated person will support him.

Thanks for your visit and comment.

-YT 

Snowwhite

Do you actually think that all of these educated people are wrong? And you're right? Do you even know what constitutional monarchy VS absolute monarchy means? Do you know that the Japanese have a constitutional monarchy, one which the monarch has absolutely no power over people's freedoms? Did you know that Spain, England and Norway -- ALL DEMOCRATIC NATIONS -- have a constitutional (ceremonial) monarchy?

Do you know why some of us promote a system of constitutional (ceremonial) monarchy in Iran? I personally promote this sort of a system because monarchy in Iran is such a huge part of our IDENTITY as "Persians." The institution of kingship is older than 2,500 years. Our identity is and has been for years, since the invasion of Arabs, under attack. Our language has been under attackf for 1,400 years. We must protect those institutions that are WHOLLY Persian so as to promote our unique identity in a sea of Arabs. 

Moreover, in a country with so many different types of people (from Azaris , Baluchis, Lurs, Arabs etc.), Iran is always going to be threatened with REAL separatist movements. A system of democratic republic, with revolving presidents, will not always be able to unify the nation as one, whereas as a permanent head of state, like a monarch, can be the "thread" that holds the separte and distinct strands of pearls of the nation together in the face of disintegration.

Example: the symbol of Queen Elizabeth, lasting in her position through thick and thin, WWII through now, is a far more UNIFYING symbol than any temporary resident at 10 Downing Street, whether it be the charismatic Tony Blair or the uncharismatic Gordon Brown. The British people, liberal or conservative, rally around the Queen -- she's a source of unity, whereas Tony Blair, for example, in the end, was a source of discord and disunity amongst the masses. Discord and disunity in a country like Iran could spell disintigeration, i.e., separatist movements.

This is why I support a system of constitutional monarchy. In a country like Iran, if we only have a one or two term president, there may be times of serious disunity in the nation, which would make it ripe for disintegration, but if we also had a ceremonial head of state, like a constitutional monarch, like a regal mother or father to all, it could provide a level of unity amongst the masses, specially in times of distress.

Iran will always be in danger of separatism, even today. That's just a fact. In my opinion, the institution of constitutional monarchy, is best suited to arouse patriotism under the flag of the nation as one and hold the country together.

I for one can not believe

I for one can not believe any educated, liberal, democratic and freedom loving person would support monarchy in Iran.  But sadly I do know many educated people who are monarchist. 

Reza Pahlavi:

"اول آن خانه را بسازيم. اول آن آتش را خاموش کنيم، و برسيم به آن مرحله که حق رأی را به شهروندان ايرانی برگردانيم؛ حق رأيی را که اکنون ندارند. بعد ادعا کنيم که راه من بهتر است يا راه تو. آن را هم در نهايت بايد به انتخاب گذاشت. فايده‌اش چيست که بنشينيم تا ابد و بگوئيم حرف من از حرف تو درست‌تر است؟ "

//iranian.com/main/blog/david-et-32

delete

Delete

-YT 

Ms. Rusta

You are absolutely correct, many of your comments, DK's and mine are missing.

I am going to notify Mr. Javid. 

P/S If you notice the thread by Jaleho //iranian.com/main/blog/jaleho/norooz-1389-te... does not appear on the most commented list either.

Thanks for noticing it

-YT 

Are comments deleted?

Hi Captain

Am I right in saying that a number of comments (including my recent ones) are deleted from your blog? 

Thanks

FR

Bahramerad

"I just ignore you and hope that you may find your answeres somewhere else- presumbley where you are more at home and where the words of the answere given to you are more palatable to your ears. ( say in Shahre e No )."

PRICELESS!

QOM IS THE REMNANT AND REFUGE OF OUR ARAB INVADERS 

Your Questions........

@capt_ayhab : If someone asked me a question, I will sometimes hesitate to answer him immediately and first of all think about how the questions are formed and what is the purpose of them being asked. Whether the person asking the question has an ulterior motive by the way he is putting his questions and what answers he is looking to satisfy his curiosity,

In your case , as I find you very derogatory about the subject matter - & 'Be Tar'biat' - and Biligerant in framing of your questions - I just ignore you and hope that you may find your answeres somewhere else- presumbley where you are more at home and where the words of the answere given to you are more palatable to your ears. ( say in Shahre e No ).

In the end - I will leave you with this little gem - "Answering to people like you is like spiting in the air - no good will come of it" .

jamshid.. This is how debate should take place... Thanks

I have got to admit, amiss all the childish arbadeh keshi by some shazdeh parastan aka modern day Sha'aban bimokh, you have helped the focus back to the main subject. Thanks hamvatan, this is how debate should take place so allow me to address your questions>

Your point #1

You stated[The answer is unknown at this time. Remember that Khomeini who was a
moftkhor of khoms and zkaat, and who never worked in his life, and whose
"masterpiece" was his book of tozihol masaael, suddenly became qualifed
to lead a revolution due to an optimum opportunity rising for him in
the right time.]

I personally blame late shah on this one. He gave into the pressure from akhunds and kept trying to appease them. He had the chance of having a bullet put in Khomienie brains, instead he send him to exile and was kept in comfort by Khoms and Zakaat.

Let us not forget that in those periods, literacy level was rather low and Iran was not as urbanized as it is now a days. So people were indeed more toward the religious right.

Your point #2 where you state[Well, let's ask the same questions about criticizing of other
individuals or leaders, and their supporters jumping in and defending
him. In some corners of the world, they call this freedom of speech.]

Criticism of anyone, any individual, be it a public figure, i.e. Mr. Pahlavi, or Ahmadinejad, is the essence of freedom of speech. There is a fine line though between criticizing an ordinary citizen[yourself and I] and a leader/public figure. 

Criticism of ordinary citizens are catalyst for learning, IF and WHEN it is done in a civil and logical manner. How can one expect the other side to listen when he/she is disrespectful of the other side? Particularly during tese times that all of need to have cohesion and solidarity, irrespective of our individual ideology.

Your point #3[ If Mr. Pahlavi is a proponent of democracy...,  why is it that his
cronies are hellbent in silencing anything that might be of any offense
to this person of no accomplishment?]

Just take a look at comments that are left in this very blog, by likes of Free and Cost Of Progress. If that does not answer you question what else can?

Your point #4...[Why should he "apologize" for something he didn't do, or had no role in?]

Perfectly put and I could not agree more. There has never been any remark from me blaming him personally for the deeds of his father. HOWEVER, for a man who is actively propagating human rights, where his platform is democracy and human dignity, do you not think that he should own up and acknowledge the crimes of his dynasty?

No one in the right mind should hold him personally responsible for actions of his father. But he will gain so much respect in the eyes of everyone if and when he comes out clean by condemning Shah's crime, along with IR's crimes. This is at least what I think. 

Your point #5 [He boycotted the elections because he knew it's all a fake election.
This was proven beyond shadows of any doubt. Was the election a fraud,
yes or no?]

Fine and dandy, BUT why after all the hell broke lose in Iran and Green movement formed, all of sudden he made a 180 degree turn about?

Leader are gauged by the consistent position of the issues. Would you for instance vote for a candidate in US if he/she changes hie/her position on issues that is important to you? I would doubt it?

In closing..........

I appreciate your logical and civilized debate and I need you and every person of Monarchy persuasion to know that I have nothing against your persons. I can not and will not divorce any of you from being my countrymen. What I oppose and will always oppose is the system of Monarchy. I firmly believe that by its nature Monarchy is an outdated and tyrannical model. It leads to absolute power, as we have seen in our recent history and absolute power is corrosive by its nature.

It occurred during Shah and it is happening now this moment in Iran. Just look how corrupt the government is right now.

-YT 

P/S This article might appear in Huffington Post if it passes their test. ;-)

Free, my apologies

I just wrote a note to you and told you not to waste time on this mofsed. But I ended up writing a long response myself. But that was because I didn't want him to think that nobody can come up with any answers to his line of questioning.

Ahyab, some answers and a lecture for you

Although you are directing your questions to Monarchists, but since I like many of RP's views, here are some answers for you:

#1: Does this gentleman has ANY... qualification that it takes to consolidate a movement...?

The answer is unknown at this time. Remember that Khomeini who was a moftkhor of khoms and zkaat, and who never worked in his life, and whose "masterpiece" was his book of tozihol masaael, suddenly became qualifed to lead a revolution due to an optimum opportunity rising for him in the right time.

There are tons of people who looked more than competent but ended up as some of the most incompetent rulers the earth has seen. Conversely, there are many who may look inept on the surface, but turn out to be competent in due time.

Which one is RP? We can't tell right now. I think he might be weak in the area of fighting against the IRI, but may be competent in other areas.

"Question #2: Why and why not it is considered blasphemy by all of his devout followers ... to question and or criticize the borne into man of no accomplishment?"

Well, let's ask the same questions about criticising of other individuals or leaders, and their supporters jumping in and defending him. In some corners of the world, they call this freedom of speech. That is you are entitled to criticize, but the criticized person is entitled to defend himself AND in turn critisize the opponent and his motifs.

Of course, for you, freedom of speech means only the right to criticize, and not to hear anything back.

Question #3: If Mr. Pahlavi is a proponent of democracy...,  why is it that his cronies are hellbent in silencing anything that might be of any offense to this person of no accomplishment?

Errr... Isn't this a repeat of the previous question? Are you even qualified to teach first grade? But to be sure that you absorb and "comprehend" the answer, I do agree with you that monarchists are touchy and sensitive, but do you believe that they are entitled to respond to critisim in a like manner (polite conversation when the other side is polite and harsher when the other side is harsh)?

Again, get this to your ertejaa'ee reformist mind which is habituated in crushing any opponent: People are entitled to respond to cirtisim in a like manner.

"Question #4: Why and why not this person Reza Pahlavi, who sets claim to 3000 year old heritage of Cyrus and Xerxes, who allegedly is a advocate of human rights is yet to go on records in condemning action of his father...."

Why should he "apologize" for something he didn't do, or had no role in? For example, take your hero Mousavi, does he have to apologize for Khomeini's crimes, including the 1988 massacre? That would be more adequate since at least he had some sort of a role in khomeini's government in those days, but I don't see you requiring him to apologize.

And why not, Ahyab? Why shouldn't Mousavi apologize?

Question #5: Mr. Reza Pahlavi……Why is it that you boycott elections and once street fights breakout between our brave youth and Baseeji militia, all of sudden you find a microphone to regurg itate your repetitious talking point?

He boycotted the elections because he knew it's all a fake election. This was proven beyond shadows of any doubt. Was the election a fraud, yes or no?

And the people poured into the street BECAUSE the elections were fake, not because the proponent of election KNEW in advance that there will be hell breaking loose. Quite the contrary, the proponents of election were hoping for a calm transition of government to reformists, not a revolution or a movement against the establishment.

Now the same proponents of election want to take credit for the riots that ensued. On one hand, they say that the elections were legit in Iran, come and vote! On the other hand, they want to take credit for the protests that ensued. Protests that were BECAUSE people were lied about the legitimacy of the election process... By who other than the proponents of election themselves!

The movement that ensued was BECAUSE the elections were fake to begin with, which makes RP and other opponents of election to stand to have been correct all along.

Question #6: How stupid do you really think Iranians who are sacrificing day in and day out are? As stupid as You dude?

Well, the same question could be asked from Khomeini. While people in Iran were sacrificing day in and day out, he was sitting pretty in the comfort of Paris giving speeches and asking people to do even more sacrifice! That's ok with you, isn't it? But for RP to come out and just talk about Human Rights, that's not ok!

roo ke nist, be sange paaye ghazvin migeh zeki. Your homework for tonight Ahyab is to re-read my response and try to learn something from it, not about RP or criticism and so on, but rather about your own self.

Free jan,

Ma mokhlessim, Yes I perhaps exaggerated a bit on the zero at the right of the 8 [lol]; Maybe if we divide it by 100 we'll get something closer to the reality [Wink - as says Ayhab]

I posted a blog asking publicly Capt_Ayhab some other questions. Please come and interact on it:

//iranian.com/main/blog/shaban-jafari/few...

!!!

Funny and priceless you children.........

move on

On to the next story................ shall we children?

BUT Got to admit tough.... One eyed crying prince of yours  is priceless, ain't it Kadivar?

-YT 

Mr. Jafari

Priceless questions, well done.  Specially the one about his IQ, except 80 is rather generous. Take away the zero, i.e., his shoe size is the accurate number.

let us all concentrate children, Reza needs you all

Question #1: Does this gentleman has ANY, NONE or ALL of the
qualification that it takes to consolidate a movement[revolution] of
this magnitude? Why or why not??

Question #2: Why and why not it is considered blasphemy by all of his
devout followers including  characters such as Mr. Ahy  to question and
or criticize the borne into man of no accomplishment?

Question #3: If[which I doubt very seriously] Mr. Pahlavi is a proponent
of democracy, which has embedded in its roots, freedom of speech, and
right to question a person of authority, why is it that his cronies are
hellbent in silencing anything that might be of any offense to this
person of no accomplishment?[Be jegheye ishum bar bokhoreh?]

Question #4: Why and why not this person Reza Pahlavi, , who sets claim
to 3000 year old heritage of Cyrus and Xerxes, who allegedly is a
advocate of human rights is yet to go on records in condemning action of
his father, who is the sole responsible, ineffective, tyrannical,
treasonous, 3 times fugitive in the face of adversaries, man who pledged
his soul to kinds of Nixon, Carter and Kissinger, man who did not have
the guts to stand and defend the people, man who ……………………….

Question #5: Mr. Reza Pahlavi…… Who do you serve? Why is it that you
boycott elections and once street fights breakout between our brave
youth and Baseeji militia, all of sudden you find a microphone to
regurgitate your repetitious talking point?

Question #6: How stupid do you really think Iranians who are sacrificing
day in and day out are? As stupid as You dude?.............. I beg the
differ, no one can beat you buddy.

-YT 

Dear Jamshid,

Thank you for the heads-up, it's greatly appreciated. I did not know about that previous post, how sickening and reprehensible. I agree with you, I will no longer waste my time on this revolting, shameless character. Thank you for saving me a lot of time.

What's amazing to me, and this says something about the men and women in charge of Iranian.com, is that they actually agreed with this uber porroo on one occasion on this thread when he flagged one of my posts, which was censored. How can anyone take this shameless hypocrite seriously?

God bless our tortured motherland, in the hands of these barbarians.

God bless her.  

Free

Free, you are wasting your time with this person. Let me put it this way for you. When someone posted a video of beaten men laying down in a basement in Iran (dating back to the protests), What do you think Ahyab's reaction was?

Read it yourself below, and then tell me how one could argue with such excessively decadent and corrupt (faased) individual? Here is what he wrote in response to the video (the boldface is by me):

"You people  are hopeless, taking something (the video) that you are not perhaps sure about its authenticity. Do you even care what Vatican has been covering up for decades? RAPE of 1000's of DEAF CHILDREN under the supervision of bishops... Unless the KHAREJI deaf kids are not that important to you..."

And on and on. Then he concludes it by this priceless mother of all jems:

"Your hypocrisy is astonishingly sad."

Now again I ask you, how do you argue with a "mofsed" like this who happens to have no bound in "por rooyi" either? If you have an answer, you would deserve a medal!

Ayhab,

I'm not Free! You posted a profanity blog on me,  I came to see what's your problem? You cannot stop braging, talking and shalp-sholooping! You have either a high estime of your intelligence, which I personally find very poor or you're a female and need to talk  your daily 2500 words.

Anyway, you came, opened your mouth and evacuated all your stress. You can't simply ask people to shut their mouth up in return when you hurt their feelings and come over your stupidity again and again. Mikhastam behet begam, ta akhar ba hatam. No need to ask me to leave your blog, you have to answer these few questions before.

Question #1. What was your problem when you were a child? Did your dad kicked your a## every day you went to school [for having such a huge hatred]?

Question #2. How do you behave in your  class? I beat that half of your students are traumatized with you, is it just half or all your class suffers with you?

Question #3. How do you mark students that you don't like?

Question #4. What mark would you have gave to RP if he was in your class? [I beat a 'F' all the time.]

Question #5. Do you think that someone has to pay for the mistakes of his/her parents?

Question #6. What mistakes have committed your parents?

Question #7. Have you tested your IQ? [I beat it's lower than 80]

Question #8. How much money does IRI give you to post absurdities everyday on IC?

You have either to answer these questions or barayeh ma Hendi berakhssi, make your choice. [I brought the fan for your hairs.]

But seriously Free the Bimokh

Get your pals[Cost of progress, jamshid and who ever else] put your minds together[sorry for mind thingy] get your strategy together and let us all gather in Sha'ban bimokh thread . //iranian.com/main/blog/capt-ayhab/shaaban-ja...
and have at it................ you 4 against me one?

are you children up to it? or are you all full of hot air?

-YT 

Go to your room FREE

LOL, unless you are willing to kiss the ring.

-YT 

Ayhab

To hanooz 1 salo chand roozet ham nashodeh!! Kashkeh chi bessabam, bacheh?