یکی از بزرگترین درسهای زندگی من در تجربهی یکی، دو سال اخیرم، بخصوص در دربافتهای تئوریکی که در این سه ماه ناقابل از کلاسهای تئوری دکتر مارک هوبارت، گرفتهام این است: هر جا به تقسیمهای دوگانه برخوردید حواستان را جمع کنید، خطر نزدیک است.
حالا خطر چیست؟ بر اساس دریافت ناقص من تا حالا از آموختههایم، خطر این است که این تقسیمهای دوگانه نشانهی برخوردی از نوع علوم طبیعی با علوم انسانی است. اشتباهی فلسفی که بر کل تاریخ علوم انسانی تولید شده در «غرب» از زمان روشنگری یا Enlightenment شروع شده و کلید فهم آن هم در ساختار دوگانهی دکارتی «بدن/ذهن» است.
روی همین حساب است که میبینید تا قبل از اینکه متفکران پستاستراکچرالیست (که من آگاهانه ترجمهاش میکنم فراسختار، نه پساساختار) این دوگانهها را بشکنند، تقریبا تمام روشهای مطالعه در علوم انسانی (از جامعهشناسی بگیرید تا روانشناسی) در سلطهی چنین رویکردهای فلسفی بوده است.
با همین منطق است که باید از دوگانههایی مثل «داننده/دانسته»، «فرم/محتوا»، «عین/ذهن»، «رسانه/پیام»، «مدرن/سنتی» و شاید از همه مهمتر «تئوری/عمل» پرهیز کرد.
برای شروع، پیشنهاد میکنم به سبک مارشال مکلوهان که میگوید «رسانه همان پیام است» بیاییم و این دوگانهها را بشکنیم و ببینم چه اتفاقی میافتد: عین همان ذهن است؛ داننده جدا از دانسته نیست؛ محتوا همان فرم است؛ مدرن و سنتی از هم جدا نیستند؛ و باز هم از همه مهمتر «تئوری همان عمل است و عمل همان تئوری است.» این آخری چیزی است که بتشکن بزرگ علوم انسانسی، یعنی سرور و سالارمان میشل فوکو، برای بازنگری در مفهوم گفتمان یا دیسکورس استفاده میکند و میگوید که گفتمان فقط شامل حرف و متن و تئوری نیست، بلکه عمل را هم شامل میشود.
خلاصه اینکه مثلا اکبر گنجی فقط چیزهایی نیست که برای توجیه مداخلهی خارجی به بهانهی دریافت جهانشمولش از حقوق بشر مینویسد، بلکه عمل او، یعنی اینکه مثلا این نوشتهها را در خاک آمریکا و در پناه حمایت مادی و معنوی آن کشور مینویسد، بخشی از گفتمان اوست. یا مثلا همانقدر که نوشتهها و حرفهایش دربارهی حقوق زنان مهم است، عمل او در یک سال و اندی ول کردن زن و بچهاش به امان خدا در ایران هم اهمیت دارد و بخشی از حرفی است که میزند.
Recently by hoder | Comments | Date |
---|---|---|
راه گلشیفته را باز نگه داریم | 18 | Oct 13, 2008 |
عدم خشونت خوب است، ولی فقط برای ما؟ | 10 | Sep 17, 2008 |
آمریکا را در همین اتاق تاریک نگه داریم | 12 | Aug 11, 2008 |
Person | About | Day |
---|---|---|
نسرین ستوده: زندانی روز | Dec 04 | |
Saeed Malekpour: Prisoner of the day | Lawyer says death sentence suspended | Dec 03 |
Majid Tavakoli: Prisoner of the day | Iterview with mother | Dec 02 |
احسان نراقی: جامعه شناس و نویسنده ۱۳۰۵-۱۳۹۱ | Dec 02 | |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day | 46 days on hunger strike | Dec 01 |
Nasrin Sotoudeh: Graffiti | In Barcelona | Nov 30 |
گوهر عشقی: مادر ستار بهشتی | Nov 30 | |
Abdollah Momeni: Prisoner of the day | Activist denied leave and family visits for 1.5 years | Nov 30 |
محمد کلالی: یکی از حمله کنندگان به سفارت ایران در برلین | Nov 29 | |
Habibollah Golparipour: Prisoner of the day | Kurdish Activist on Death Row | Nov 28 |
Take it easy!
by J:Rashidian (not verified) on Sun Dec 02, 2007 08:31 AM PSTاوا ئل انقلاب وقتی بازاروشنفکری پر طمطراقتر بود, استاد شما"دکتر"بنی صدر معتقد بود از موی زنان اشعه ای می آید که مرد ها را تحریک می کند. بر این اساس پیش قدم شد و دانشگاها را تا حل این نیاز علمی بستند.
اقا حسین شما که یک نسل ازاون "دکتر" جوانترید و هنوز مدارج استادی را طی نکرده اید.
حالا کمی کوتاه بیا و بذار اون برادر بزرگتر, اقا اکبر, که کمی هم از شما بیشتر با فلسفه و کانت اشنائی دارد یه
چند سالی هم مثل شما از مظاهر کفر و نا مسلمانی غرب درس عبرت بگیرد
.
تو را به مذهب مشترکتان بس کن. رده درازی در مباحث فلسفی برا چس مثقال نتیجه گیر که اکبر گنجی
اینجا زیادی است و باید برگردد سر خانه زندگیش در ایران تف سر بالاست.
بعلاوه شما باید این دعوای خانگی را حل کنید چون ضرر آن متوجه کل رژیم شما میشد نه احد ناس.
سردبير
Bahram the IranianSat Dec 01, 2007 10:16 PM PST
سردبير گويانيوز، از نزديكان احسان نراقي (نظريه پرداز اصلاح طلبان)، ابوالحسن بني صدر (رئيس جمهور مخلوع)، احمد سلامتيان (مشاور بني صدر) و عليرضا نوري زاده (روزنامه نگار فراري) است و تاكنون اشخاصي مانند «حسين درخشان»، «اميد.م»، «روزبه. الف»، «شهرام.ر»، « بابك.غ»، «نيما .ر» و... را براي سازمان هاي جاسوسي شكار كرده است. برخي از اين افراد، عليرغم وعده هاي فرشاد- ب اكنون در شرايط سختي در اروپا و آمريكا زندگي خفت بار خود را مي گذرانند. خانه اين فرد كه در منطقه شمالي شهر بروكسل واقع است، به پاتوق عيش و نوش هاي جمعي از ضدانقلاب هاي لمپن، شهرت دارد.
فرشاد با مدعيان
this is what copy&paste out of kehan news daily. pepole
call Hossien a spy are acutaly quiet in line with Mr Sharitmadari.
//www.kayhannews.ir/860911/2.htm#other210
Act or Theory?
by persian west-ender (not verified) on Sat Dec 01, 2007 07:42 PM PSTCommon Hoder! You mean since Akbar Ganji chose to go US he can not criticize US? It is exacly what he is doing (criticizing it for military approach against Iran that may curb democracy movement)why not seeing his gofteman(theory or dialectic) as his act? This logic is wrong in essence. why you chose to go Israel when you keep criticizing Israili loby? what sould be considered? your act or your Gofteman?In the contrary, I believe acts like this seems to be ground-breaking against seeing things as balck and whit, and if it is not in the favor of post-structuralism is in favor of post-modernism at least.
Moreover, when you physically leave something, does it mean that you lost your commitment to that? If Ganji has left his family it means he is discredited for having concerns about them? So why you have conerns about Iran as is reflected in your blog while you left it long time ago? I tried to write to your blog, but it has some security problems and doesn't allow. Cheers
Instead of making fun of him, challenge him
by A nonymous (not verified) on Sat Dec 01, 2007 05:48 AM PSTYou are all obsessed with his personal life. Why not respond to what he is actually writing instead? You don't have to agree with him, and it's ok - it's not the end of the world, or IRAN! We can disagree without resorting to attacks.
Very ...
by Bahaheram (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 05:49 PM PSTI still don't understand why personal conflicts should screw up a guy this much. hoder used to be a thinker now he just wants to be different.
Man, its good that we see hossein he is a good example of how idiocy can make a mess out of someone. Thanks for letting him speak
Re: Hoder
by jamshid on Fri Nov 30, 2007 05:39 PM PSTHoder, you are still writing? I keep telling you STOP! Instead get in shape! Exercise, strech you know.... get in shape!
The fall of this regime is near. Soon the streets of Iran will be filled with fed up and angry people and IRI will be gone. There will be a reward on your head! Your Canadian citizenship won't save you! Merceneries will be after you to collect their reward... You know take you back to be tried and put in prison with hard labor. Hence getting in shape.
Where will you hide? Stop supporting the dying IRI. You write well and you can join the people of Iran and echo their cause for freedom. It's not too late.
Gooz be Shaghih haman Shaghih be Gooz Ast
by Nader Vanaki (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 05:01 PM PSTWow! Hoder my man reciting from his philosophy 101 course and suddenly taking detour on Ganji. Your writings is crap just like crap is your writing. That is dualism. I think you should discuss the theory of relativity next. Your crap writing relative to pure crap writing etc.....
Hossein, you go too far again; leave personal life alone!
by farrad02 on Fri Nov 30, 2007 03:07 PM PSTHossein.
You are going low again! You are not being fair at all! If Akbar Ganji's kids and wife are given a choice between their father/husband living abroad as a free man vs. living in a prison cell and dying in Iran, which one do you think they will choose! So, don't even mention that again. This is why many consider you a bottom dweller!!!
Secondly, why do you focus on someone's personal life? How would you like it for people to start focusing on your past marriage and relationship with Marjan and what you did to cause the divorce, etc?
Grow up please!
To: Jahanshah Javid - This should be a Blog entry
by farrad02 on Fri Nov 30, 2007 02:57 PM PSTJahanshah,
Just a friendly advice.
I have no problem with Hossein posting this type of materials here. Freedom of expression is paramount! But as you have told me before when I tried to submitt "impressions" like this; this is NOT an article. Material like this can and should be presented as a Blog entry!
I hope you are not intimidated to accept this as an article. Because you tell other people to resubmit their stuff as Blog entries.
Again, I have no issue with freedom of expression, but this is not suited to be a featured article! This should be a Blog entry!
Short of pro-IRI materials
by Anonymous 32 (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:36 PM PSTIs the site so far in need of pro IRI materials to post such preach like craps.
this is not an article, or a
by mm (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM PSTthis is not an article, or a report, or anyhing of that matter. all it is is a personal attack by this guy on a well known and credited man, containing no facts what so ever. it's hatred to say the least. why iranian.com posts such materials... I don't know.
it's not non-sacred, it's crap.
Do as I say not as I do
by Anonymouso (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:38 AM PSTYou of all people making that kind of judgement is just rich.
and who is saying that and
by paya (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:24 AM PSTand who is saying that and interfere in others personal life? someone who has divorced two wives and lives in London and has Canadian passport...and use drugs and....dude before judging others personal life take look at your own ...life
Post-graduate musings
by Anonymous-today (not verified) on Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:23 AM PSTDon't forget the logical extension of what you're suggesting: a bullet in the head of anyone who for instance opposes, in words alone, the nuclear program in Iran since words are not separable from action. To even utter an opinion which might on any basis coincide with, say, Bush's position is to fall in the same step and therefore since Bush is an enemy of Iran then all who agree with him will be enemies of Iran. Hoder’s reasoning is very old. Just as Enlightenment had its dark side the anti-Enlightenment theories including Foucault's have their dark side. The Moscow trials were convened on this same basis. The esteemed post-graduate author of these homilies could use another read, Maurice Merlau-Ponty’s Humanism and Terror.